Resharper 9 vs 2015 method stub
- Resharper 9 vs 2015 method stub how to#
- Resharper 9 vs 2015 method stub full#
- Resharper 9 vs 2015 method stub trial#
- Resharper 9 vs 2015 method stub series#
Resharper 9 vs 2015 method stub trial#
If you aren’t using anything like that, I suggest you give it a shot download the trial version and watch the training videos so that you can see what you can do with it. Well, again, there’s a lot to be said about this tool. You can checkout what kinds of templates we’ve create here.
Resharper 9 vs 2015 method stub how to#
To make the life of the developers who use our Milos framework easier, I’ve created a bunch of CodeRush Templates that expand to code that we use a lot but can’t really always remember exactly how to write it. The last I’ve seen about VS Code Snippets, one has to deal with some nasty XML to create custom templates (maybe somebody created a visual IDE for it by this time, but there doesn’t seem to be anything in VS for that). I also like how easy it is to create your own templates (there’s a training video about this on their site). That means that I don’t have to worry about the C# curly braces, or the VB verbosity. For instance, in order to create a method that returns a DataSet, all I need to type is mds (as in method data set) this will cause a template to expand in the appropriate way, both in C# and in VB. I also like the fact that CodeRush helps me I’m constantly switching between C# and VB code. I sure prefer typing less code and focus more on the task I’m trying to accomplish. Until you get used to that, you end up having double parentheses: the one CodeRush puts in for you, and the one that you manually type in.Īfter I got used to that kind of thing, oh boy, it is really hard to work on a computer that doesn’t have CodeRush installed one has to type a LOT more code. For instance, if you type if and hit the spacebar, CodeRush will open and close parentheses for you. The main reason for that is because CodeRush tries to predict what your next action is, and it takes the action for you. When I first started, like most people, I thought it was getting in my way. I’ve been using this product for about 3 years or so now. If you’re already used to VS 2005 Code Snippets, all I can say is that, as far as I’ve seen, CodeRush is waaaaaaaay superior to that. Those videos can show the product in a much better way that I can explain it hear. If you have never seen CodeRush before, I suggest you check out the product’s Training Videos (try out the ones on Navigation, Cool Templates, and Refactoring). The other reason is that, as far as I’m concerned, CodeRush is way better than Code Snippets. I’ve decided to stick with CodeRush for two main reasons: one is because CodeRush was available even going back to VS 2002, so I was using it way before Code Snippets showed up with VS 2005. Instead, I use a tool called CodeRush, which I’m going to talk about next. I can’t really say a lot about Code Snippets because I don’t use them. These are just a few examples: there’s a lot more that comes with VS 2005, and you can also search on the web for other code snippets that other developer have put out there.
Or in order to create a property and the field that goes along with it, one could just type prop and hit the spacebar.
Resharper 9 vs 2015 method stub full#
For instance, in order to create a class, instead of typing the full class definition, one could just type class and hit the spacebar, and the main skeleton of a new class gets created automatically. Code Snippets are just what the name implies: snippets of code that you can use. VS 2005 brought to the table a feature called VS 2005 Code Snippets. This line of thinking also applies to writing code. The idea being that when I’m writing code I want to have the least friction between me and my task possible.
Resharper 9 vs 2015 method stub series#
My main motivation for using the tools and tips that I’ve shared on the series is so that I can have less interruption when I’m trying to write code and implement something. A capacitance at some specific distance from the loadĭ.Let’s continue the series on productivity… The best method of matching consists of connectingĬ. A (75 – j50)-ohm is connected to a coaxial transmission line of Zo = 75 ohms, at 10 GHz.